Showing posts with label Usama bin Ladin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Usama bin Ladin. Show all posts

20 March 2008

Morning Coffee (118)

Bona Dea, can you believe that March is in its 20th day already? I believe today is the vernal equinox, which would make today the first day of spring. I think that also means that I need to sacrifice a sheep or something to the many evil, pagan gods we atheists worship. I’ll have to check my Necronomicon and Book of the Dead when I get home. I shan’t shirk my sacrificial duties.

Let’s see…what’s happening today. Oh, Usama bin Ladin released his newest EP today, called “To All My Martys in the FATA, Or Federally Administered Tribal Areas for Those Thugs Who Don’t Know.” Sounds long, but it’s best read in the original Arabic. Nevertheless, “FATA” shows that the Islam-West battle is still raging, and through Usama’s acerbic hooks can you tell that the feud is showing no signs of letting up. For example, in the enchanting, droning rap, “Slammin’ the Pope” bin Ladin sings “Gonna grab ya by your funny robe and throw ya down, then stomp on ya till your pulp stains the groun’.” One must ask, what will the Pope’s Posse reply with? My favorite tune is, “Gonna build me an IED, What, WHAT!” This tune has a driving drum beat which will surely blow up in all the dance clubs in Pashtunistan. The title track, “All My FATA Martyrs” might be the most ambitious of the songs. In it, Usama attempts to weave the Hadith with the names of, well, all the martyrs. Problem is, there are only like five different names, so the variety is a bit lacking. Overall, I’d give “TAMMITFATA” three and a half stars out of five.

Okay, give me a break, this isn’t Pulitzer Prize winning journalism here. I try to keep it interesting. Current events are hard when you’ve got to compete with “Lost” and “American Idol.”

In all seriousness, bin Ladin did release a new tape. Or the message has been attributed to bin Ladin; who knows if he actually did it or not. Anyway, in it, he condemns/slams Europe, the US, and the Pope. He primarily discussed the whole cartoon bit of 2005/2006, as apparently a dozen or so newspapers in Denmark have reprinted those cartoons. By the way, one Danish cartoonist is still in hiding, and several people plotting to kill him were recently arrested. In my opinion, this new tape is a shining example of glorious hypocrisy. For example, Usama says that those cartoons mocked Islam’s founder and violated “the etiquettes of dispute and fighting.” Seriously, he really said that. I guess he forgot about, you know, flying planes into buildings containing civilians. If we count that as within the bounds of etiquette, how about using mentally disabled women as suicide bombers? What about telling a man he must drive a delivery to a certain location or you’ll kill his entire family, but in reality, you’re going to blow up his car with him in it? Is that etiquette enough? Usama bin Ladin is one to lecture on the etiquette of fighting. The only etiquette al-Qaida follows in fighting and disputing are the rules they adhere to when it suits them. He then followed that gem up with, “the laws of men which clash with the legislation of Allah the Most High are null and void, aren’t sacred, and don’t matter to us.” Mother of god the puerile intellect of the man is startling, no? I have no problem agreeing with this statement, so long as we can say the same. “The laws of Allah the Not-So Merciful which clash with the laws of reason are null and void, aren’t sacred, don’t matter to us, and best left in the 13th century where they belong.” We’ll agree to disagree. Meanwhile, we should not fear those who purport peace and tolerance while throwing bricks through windows of Danish businesses because of some cartoons. Bin Ladin and his friends are welcome to enforce their archaic rules in their lands; our lands are by their nature exempt from such rules.

Obama’s Pastoral Gaff:

Some people have asked me what I think of the issue that has recently come up about Obama’s pastor, who has given sermons which one might describe as divisive. Well, what I think has already been opined by a plethora of pundits, that being that it seems impossible to believe that he didn’t know or hear about the things that Wright had said, even if he wasn’t in sermons in which Wright said those things. But Obama responded as he usually does; by giving a powerful performance in the form of a very eloquent speech. Kudos to him. It doesn’t change the fact that his spiritual advisor said some pretty damning things. I hate to mess with racial issues, but if a white pastor were to say those things, I think the response would have been obvious. Mort Kondracke wrote a decent article on the issue here, but you could easily read about it just about anywhere or by doing a little searching. Mort always seems to get run over when he’s on Brit Hume’s show on Fox News (not that I’ve watched Fox or any news in a long time), but he’s a pretty good writer.

The thing of it is, this issue might have been deadly to Obama were it revealed six months ago, or even three. But he’s got a lot of momentum now, and frankly, his numbers are virtually insurmountable. That sort of sucks. I’d hate to think that we might elect someone whose entire message of bringing people together was an absolute falsity, and we found out about it, but were unable to do anything about it because it was too late to change in the moronic primary system. Ho hum, another day in paradise.

Another short one today folks. For that, I apologize. Hopefully you’ve been entertained for a few minutes anyway.

Word of the Day: Acerbic (adjective): Sharp, biting, or acid in temper, expression, or tone.

On This Day in History: The Roman poet Ovid, who wrote a great deal about love, was born (43 BCE). Napoleon enters Paris after escaping Elba. With him he brings an army of 140,000 regulars and 200,000 volunteers (1815). Talk about charisma. Upon his return to France, he approached the 5th Regiment, which was ordered to meet his return and prevent it, alone and upon dismounting his horse said, “Soldiers of the Fifth, you recognize me. If any man would shoot his emperor, he may do so now.” Their reply was not gunfire, but “Vive L’Empereur!” French minister Richelieu, notorious in his own right, said in anger after hearing of Napoleon’s visitors while in exile on St. Helena, “this devil of a man exercises an astonishing seduction on all those who approach him.” Despite this, he basically demolished France’s standing as a world power. Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin was published (1852). Albert Einstein publishes the general theory of relativity (1916). A sarin gas attack, perpetrated by the cult Aum Shinrikyo, killed 12 and wounded 1,300 (1995).

“Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence.” – Napoleon Bonaparte.

03 November 2006

Morning Coffee (03)

Today's Morning Coffee is brought to you by Boredom. When you've got nothing to do, boredom is there for you.

It's cold out today here in Dayton; weather.com reports that it is currently 23F. For those of you in Erie, it is currently 35F, and for anyone in the Southern California area, it happens to be right around 62F.

I just read a Reuters article that states that the British fear George Bush more than Kim Jong-Il. Yes, you read that right. More. Bush makes the world a more dangerous place, according to British, Canadians, Mexicans, and Israelis. The only person more dangerous: Osama bin Laden. 87% of Britons felt that the Laden-meister was a great or moderate danger to peace, whereas 75% thought the same of G-dub. The Kim-ster tallied a 69% (go Kim), Ahmadine, ahmadeni, amadena-not-gonna-work-here-any-more (the Iranian guy), clocked in at a measly 62%. I guess the Brits don't read the snot that Ahmadinejad spews on a daily basis - Israel should be whipped off the face of the earth, die Zionist pigs, etc. The guy actually scored "better" than Kim. In my humble opinion, Ahmadinejad might just be the person who is the MOST dangerous to world peace. Consider the potential to start a major conflict in a volatile region: A fanatical leader, missiles with the range to strike Tel-Aviv, rapidly growing "peaceful" nuclear program, the ability to control the Straits of Hormuz (through which a gargantuan amount of oil flows), control over a violent and fairly effective group that technically fought the vaunted Israeli army to a stand-still, and immense influence over Iraq's Shia "militias" (insurgents, jihadists, whatever you want to call them this week). If you believe in that Bible book everyone reads so much, Armageddon starts in the Levant...

Let's compare to Kim: Potential nuclear weapons (of unknown reliability and capability - who knows if they would even work), missiles with the potential to reach the western US (I say potential because they might not make it off the launch pad). And these two things are the PLUSES! Consider an economy that is worth about as much as all of my belongings (not much folks), a population that is malnourished and scarred by a lifetime of propaganda, greatly inferior military weapons systems, utter dependence on the goodwill of its arch-rival (South Korea) and its benefactor, China (which is pretty angry at the People's Democratic Republic…I love saying that). I'm not to sure Kim's all that dangerous. Yes, he could start a war. Yes, it could be ugly. And yes, he's the bane of young girls and Japanese movie stars everywhere. But he simply doesn't have the ability to influence world events like Ahmadinejad.

Now, examine bin Ladin: Has no country. Has limited resources. The worlds most hunted man. Constantly on the run. Hated and despised the world over. Hasn't made a significant move in five years. Might be dead. Might not be dead. Is frankly in the top spot because of his reputation: he is the scariest of the bunch because of his aura and mystique. Yeah, he hates us, yeah, he's got a cadre of pretty dedicated men. But he's living on his rep, and this rep, while duly earned, simply shouldn't be enough to a rational human being to include. Honestly, since he ISN'T the leader of a foreign nation, and he IS shrouded in mystery, he's basically the boogie-man. And that scares people. Because people are scared sheep. It's the fear of the unknown that gets us.

So, who's the most dangerous person to world peace? Who knows. It's not like some scientific scale can be applied to this, where points are given for certain behaviors and capabilities. But I will say that, despite Bush's clear believe, faith, what-have-you, he's tempered by a thing called checks and balances. Despite what some may believe, he cannot wage war with whomever he wants. Not to mention, our conventional military's stretched a wee bit thin. You decide. I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts.

A quote for my writer wife: "I can write better than anybody who can write faster, and I can write faster than anybody who can write better." - AJ Liebling (1904-1963)

Word of the Day: Fillip (noun) (pronounced like FILL-up): 1. a snap of the finger forced suddenly from the thumb; a smart blow. 2. something serving to rouse or excite; a stimulus. 3. a trivial addition; an embellishment. Also a transitive verb.

On this Day in History: Income tax first introduced in the US (1913).

Currently in my head: Tool, Taylor Swift "Tim McGraw", Snow Patrol "Chasing Cars" (that WAS kind of strange huh, Jen?).

I will see you all Monday. Have a good day today and a great weekend.